翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Bradwell, Derbyshire ・ Bradwell, Devon ・ Bradwell, Milton Keynes ・ Bradwell, Norfolk ・ Bradwell, Saskatchewan ・ Bradwell, Staffordshire ・ Bradwell-on-Sea ・ Bradwood Landing ・ Bradworthy ・ Bradwyn Guinto ・ Bradley's Barn ・ Bradley's Beat ・ Bradley's Country Store Complex ・ Bradley's Covered Bridge ・ Bradley's Records ・ Bradley's regress ・ Bradley's Robot ・ Bradley's Toy Money Complete with Game of Banking ・ Bradley, Arkansas ・ Bradley, Boone County, West Virginia ・ Bradley, California ・ Bradley, Cheshire ・ Bradley, Derbyshire ・ Bradley, England ・ Bradley, Gloucestershire ・ Bradley, Hampshire ・ Bradley, Illinois ・ Bradley, Lincolnshire ・ Bradley, Louisville ・ Bradley, Maine Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Bradley's regress ： ウィキペディア英語版 Bradley's regress Bradley's Regress is a philosophical problem concerning the nature of relations. It is named after F. H. Bradley who discussed the problem in his 1893 book ''Appearance and Reality''. It bears a close kinship to the issue of the unity of the proposition. == Description== Bradley raises the problem while discussing the bundle theory of objects, according to which an object is merely a "bundle" of properties. This theory raises the question of how the various properties that together comprise an object are related when they in fact comprise an object. More generally, the question that arises is what has to be the case for any two things to be related. Bradley's Regress appears to show that the notion of two things being related generates an infinite regress. Suppose, for example, that ''a'' respects ''b''. This state of affairs seems to involve three things: ''a'', ''b'', and the relation of respecting. For the state of affairs of ''a'' respecting ''b'' to obtain, it doesn't, however, suffice that these three things (''a'', ''b'', and the relation of respecting) exist. They must also be related in some way. What is required, we might say, is that ''a'' and ''b'' "stand in" the relation of respecting. But now we seem to have another state of affairs: the state of affairs of ''a'' and ''b'' standing in the relation of respecting. This state of affairs in turn seems to involve four things: ''a'', ''b'', the relation of respecting, and the relation of standing in. Again, however, for it to be the case that ''a'' and ''b'' stand in the relation of respecting, it doesn't suffice that these four items exist. They must also be related in some way. What is required, we might now say, is that ''a'', ''b'', and the relation of respecting stand in the relation of standing in. And so on, ad infinitum. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Bradley's regress」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.